What exactly are you attempting inaudible 00:36:01 the Department of Homeland safety? Just how do you own it accountable?
Joe Biden: (36:08) you possess it accountable when you’re president and accountable that is acting. We will have someone going that department that listens from what we state. It’s outrageous what’s being done now. And also by the real method, ICE will probably return to college. The concept that ICE is sitting away from a mass on to arrest a parent coming out as undocumented, the idea that they’re going to schools, the idea they’re going to doctor’s appointments is wrong sunday. It is about families. Families. Along with a lot of small children, a lot of small children under enormous force and mental force, wondering whether or perhaps not they’re planning to get back there’s going to be nobody here. We have to do much more. There’s a way. From my viewpoint, it is exactly about families. We need to push resources that are humanitarian ensure that we now have general public personal partnerships to guide individuals located in these conditions. We’ve got to surge resources for the asylum protectors. There’s a great deal we could do, but do you know what-
Lulu Garcia-Navarro: (37:12) Are those asylum seekers?
Joe Biden: (37:12) It’s likely to are expensive of money and I’ve been calling because of it for a 12 months . 5.
Lulu Garcia-Navarro: (37:16) Are those asylum seekers that are on the reverse side of this edge now in camps likely to be permitted to come and do their claims within the united states of america, something that will not be reported for them?
Joe Biden: (37:25) There’s got to be an orderly process for that to occur as the colleague stated. Otherwise, if i recently say, “Tomorrow, everyone results in the edge.” This is basically the time that is first. You’ve had to look for asylum in a country that is third. It is outrageous. It is outrageous. It’s incorrect.
Errol Barnett: (37:41) Mr. Vice President, your opponent in this election, President Trump, has made your state of mind a campaign subject. So when expected in June, if you’d been tested complete cognitive mobifriends decline, you’ve responded that you’re constantly tested in effect because you’re in situations similar to this regarding the campaign path. But please simplify particularly, maybe you have taken a test that is cognitive?
Joe Biden: (38:04) No, I have actuallyn’t taken a test. Why the hell would we have a test? think about it guy. That’s like saying, “Before you’ve got in this system, invest the a test where you’re using cocaine or perhaps not. Just exactly exactly What do you consider? Huh? are you currently a junky?”
Errol Barnett: (38:17) What would you tell President Trump whom brags about their make sure enables you to a message state a presssing problem for voters?
Joe Biden: (38:27) Well, if he can’t figure out of the huge difference between an elephant and a lion, we don’t understand what the hell he’s speaing frankly about. Do you watch that? Look, seriously, guy. I understand you’re attempting to goad me personally, but after all, I’m so forward-looking to own a chance to stay because of the elected President or stay utilizing the President in debates. There likely to be enough time. And also by just how, when I joke with him… i ought ton’t say it. I’m planning to state one thing We probably should not say. Anyhow, i will be extremely prepared to allow public that is american my physical in addition to my psychological physical physical fitness also to make a judgment about whom i will be and just just what situation We have, what type of physical shape I’m in, what sort of mental form I’m in.
Lulu Garcia-Navarro: (39:18) an individual who is on your own VP shortlist, Senator Kamala Harris, told NPR year that is last the Justice Department might have “no choice, but to prosecute Trump after their presidency.” Should you win, could you continue regarding the investigations that are many? Might you envision him, a previous president, being prosecuted in the event that proof shows wrongdoing?
Joe Biden: (39:43) Look, the Justice Department isn’t the President’s attorney. The lawyer general isn’t the President’s personal attorney. I will perhaps maybe not interfere utilizing the Justice Department’s judgment of whether they think they should pursue the prosecution of anyone who they believe has violated regulations-
Lulu Garcia-Navarro: (40:04) Including a president that is former?
Joe Biden: (40:06) this will depend on which occurs. This will depend on which occurs. I believe it really is an extremely, extremely uncommon thing and most likely not extremely… How may I state it? Advantageous to democracy become speaing frankly about prosecuting previous presidents.
Lulu Garcia-Navarro: (40:23) Well, just what needs to take place? You state, based on what are the results. just just What needs to take place? What’s the club for you to need to-
Joe Biden: (40:30) I don’t understand what some of those full situations happening when you look at the nyc courts are. We don’t understand the information of the cases. And so if there’s a case underway that in fact needs to be pursued and I also think it must be pursued as well as the attorney general thinks it really is, that is a really thing that is different. However in regards to saying, “I think the elected President violated what the law states. I believe the President did this, therefore get and prosecute him.” We shall perhaps perhaps not do this.